Our society is obsessed with voting and passing laws. Supposedly voting
magically makes everything alright. Whatever the majority wants, everyone
else must live with. This is garbage. How would you like to have to eat the
one and only breakfast approved by a majority?
Having that one and only majority mandated breakfast, served only at the
majority mandated time, would lead to endless strife over what to eat and when
to eat. It would also generate a black market in other kinds of breakfasts.
A law is an order. Those passing and enforcing the law say “Do it our
way, or we will hurt you.” A law not backed by force and threats of force
isn't a law, it is a joke. We can't change the violent nature of laws. We
can make it more difficult for lawmakers to invoke the use of force to control
others.
Why should a mere 51 percent be allowed to resort to the use of force
against 49 percent? Sometimes the use of force is justified. Murders should
be forced to stop. Does anyone believe murder would be legal merely because
we required a two-thirds majority to pass laws?
Why shouldn't we require at least a two-thirds majority to pass any law?
Why shouldn't those who want to resort to the use of force and threats have to
convince at least two-thirds that such use of force is justified?
Requiring super majority approval to repeal a law would be a disaster. We
need to make it easier to repeal bad laws. Let the opponents of a law
petition for reconsideration of any law. If on reconsideration the law fails
to gain super majority approval it would cease to be a law.
This will not end all exploitive and abusive laws. It will drastically
cull the herd. Few laws beyond basic laws against force and violence such as
murder, robbery, arson, rape, etc. ever had two-thirds support. Even fewer
still have such support.
Consider Obama Care. It squeaked through by a vote or two. It never came
close to having two-thirds support. Obama Care would be dead and all but
forgotten if it had needed two-thirds approval. Even if it had passed it
would now be repealed by failure to gain approval on reconsideration.
Most of the special interest strife in this country is over special
privileges granted, or sought to be granted, by laws that didn't or couldn't
ever come close to gaining super majority support. We would have a far more
peaceful and less divided nation if we eliminated the possibility of a mere
majority passing any law.
Deprived of using the political means to exploit their neighbors,
individuals would have to resort to the only means still available. They
would have to use persuasion, rewards and voluntary cooperation to pursue
their goals. They would no longer be able to resort to “Do it my way, or I
will hurt you.”
There are only two things that should be subject to voting. The first is
laws against all forms of aggression where the law must be enforced with force
and violence. The second is matters where circumstances dictate that everyone
must accept the same choice. There are very few things that fall into the
latter class.
What to eat for breakfasts, which school to attend, and the size of soft
drinks aren't included on the list. People get along better and accomplish
more when they aren't endlessly threatened with “Do it my way, or I will hurt
you.”
The federal government alone has enacted about 200,000 pages of “Do it may
way, or I will hurt you.” And, you are presumed to know, and are required to
obey, every one of them. Requiring at least two-thirds approval to keep these
laws might shorten your reading list. You do read and understand all the laws
you are ordered to obey, don't you?
aldmccallum@gmail.com
* * * * *
* * * *
* * *
* *
*
Copyright 2013
Albert D. McCallum
Considering the issues of our times. (ADM does not select or endorse the sites reached through "Next Blog.")
Thursday, October 31, 2013
How to Prevent Bad Laws
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment