Column for week of January 13, 2014 Anyone following the weather news during the early January cold wave was nearly beaten to death by the term "polar vortex." Probably most never heard the term before. The polar vortex got the blame for what was commonly called deadly cold weather. Most people probably had little memory of the last "deadly" cold wave. "Polar vortex" instantly became a frightening new kind of deadly weather. I wasn't familiar with the term either. I did remember cold waves past and saw nothing unusual about the latest edition. I did a few minutes of research to learn about the scary new beast. The polar vortexes are high altitude winds that circle the poles. Both poles have one. In the northern hemisphere we are mainly affected by the one circling the north pole. Cold polar air stays on the pole side of the polar vortex. Occasionally the polar winds weaken and the vortex bulges to the south. Cold polar air fills the bulge. That bulge can extend as far south as Florida. I suspect that most are familiar with the cold waves that occur when the jet stream dips to the far south. That dipping of the jet stream is what periodically freezes the oranges in Florida. When I was in Florida in 1990, the Everglades were dotted with dead trees killed by a severe freeze earlier in the year. That cold wave was the product of the same phenomenon that brought the recent cold wave. It was just as much a "polar ortex" as was this year's cold wave. Few, if any, people called it a polar vortex. There was nothing new about the recent cold wave. Someone merely conjured up a new name for it. The same weather phenomenon took place last year. What, you don't remember it? That probably means you weren't in Europe last winter. Last winter the Europeans and some North Africans got what we got this January. I don't know what they called their cold wave. Bulges in the polar vortex aren't uncommon. They may occur three or so times a year somewhere across North America, Europe and Asia. Why do the good, or not so good, old-fashioned cold waves suddenly have a new, scary name? A meteorologist was asked if global warming could have caused the polar vortex. He allowed as how it might have. He was a bit short on the explanation of how. Those who fanatically claim humans are heating up the world with carbon dioxide are desperate after more than a decade without any warming. Their reputations and research grants are in jeopardy. Did they trot out the scary "polar vortex" in a desperate attempt to save their sinking ship? Grasping for such a small straw would truly be an act of desperation. Perhaps they are that desperate. Why did the media grab the term and run with it? Occam's Razor says that the simplest explanation is usually the best. What simpler explanation is there than that the news media use scary stories and headlines to gain an audience? The cold wave set some record daily low temperatures. According to one weather site the old record low for Jackson on January 6 was -4°. That record plunged down to -16°. That sounds impressive until noticing that the old record for the next day was -12°, and the record low for January is -20°. This is typical of record lows and highs. They vary substantially from day to day. Records are easy to set, if the weather picks the right day to get hot or cold. Such records don't mean there has been any general change in weather or climate. Perhaps the main thing to note from all of this is that "polar vortex" is merely a different name for the extreme cold waves that have been flowing over the Northern Hemisphere since long before any of us were here to "enjoy" them. aldmccallum@gmail.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Copyright 2014 Albert D. McCallum
Considering the issues of our times. (ADM does not select or endorse the sites reached through "Next Blog.")
Monday, January 13, 2014
What Is a Polar Vortex?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment