Column for week of June 9, 2014 Government is generally believed to be inefficient. It pays $600 for a screwdriver anyone else can buy for $10. It pays many employees far more than does the private sector. Also, those employees are rarely over worked. I had some personal experience with this a few decades ago. I fought boredom in my own ways. I drew many house plans. The department where I worked didn't do houses. Within a year I resorted to the ultimate boredom fighter. I quit. People are not inherently inefficient. Most people seek to achieve their goals in the most efficient way possible. In other words, get what you want with as little effort as possible. It has been said "Laziness is the mother of invention." There is nothing wrong with finding an easier way to do something. Finding easier ways is the foundation of our prosperity. If we still did everything in the old inefficient ways of a mere hundred years ago we would have but a small fraction of what we have today. In the private sector people prosper by finding efficient ways to serve others. The more efficiently we serve others, the more we get for the time spent serving them. Making a pair of shoes in one hour is more profitable than spending two hours making the shoes. When earning your living producing for willing customers, efficiency is vital to your prosperity. It is hard to imagine that the inherent nature to be efficient dies when the individual crosses the line into the government sector. So, why are those on the government side so inefficient? Not only do they produce inefficiently, much of their effort is invested in producing things not worth making. People are motivated to efficiently produce the things that benefit them. Imagine a person who spends his entire day making paper airplanes he doesn't want and no one will buy. What motivation does he have to be efficient? It doesn't matter whether he produces 100 great airplanes or one really bad one. His goal isn't to improve his efficiency of production. His goal is only to make his day as pleasant as possible. Of course, everyone's goal is to make their days as pleasant as possible. The individual who is paid more for producing more can gain satisfaction from efficient production. The individual who gains nothing from efficient production has no reason to be efficient. It is the government environment that sucks the efficiency out of its inhabitants. Actually it doesn't suck out the efficiency, it redirects it. Instead of rewarding efficient production, government rewards efficient manipulators. Those best at manipulating the bosses, the rules, and the voters are rewarded with higher pay and more power. As manipulators their efficiency is second to none. Even if government employees want to be efficient, they usually have no way to measure their efficiency. Sure, they can measure the number or new rules they produce or enforce, the number of reports they write, and the number of accounts they audit. The only way to measure the value of a product is to see what a willing customer will pay for it. Most of what government produces isn't sold to willing customers. It is paid for by less than willing taxpayers who seldom even know what they are paying for. It is inevitable that government will always be inefficient at producing what taxpayers want because the taxpayers aren't in control. Taxpayers usually aren't in a position to reward efficient behavior and punish inefficient behavior. Government will be efficient only at producing what politicians, bureaucrats, and their powerful accomplices want. Government always has been and always will be a conspiracy of the powerful exploiting the weak. The only defense the weak have is to keep government as small and weak as possible. Powerful government is the most destructive force on earth. aldmccallum@gmail.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Copyright 2014 Albert D. McCallum
Considering the issues of our times. (ADM does not select or endorse the sites reached through "Next Blog.")
Thursday, June 19, 2014
Why Is Government Inefficient?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment