Column for week of September 1, 2014 This Country's war hawks would have us believe that the survival of the US depends on immediately destroying ISIS. They want US troops on the ground in Iraq and Syria immediately, or sooner. We must destroy ISIS, ISIL or whatever it calls itself tomorrow. Before rushing into another war, or rekindling an old war, it might be well to take a closer look at the enemy and consider what war might accomplish. ISIS is powered by militant Muslims who are eager to kill anyone who refuses to become a Muslim. They are also quite willing to kill Muslims who aren't militant and murderous enough. ISIS draws its strength from the same pool of militants as does Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and Boko Haram. ISIS isn't a new adversary. It is merely another arm of the most militant segment of Islam. These militant thugs have been waging civil war against the rest of Islam for ages. They speak of ruling the world. Before seriously taking on the world they must first conquer Islam. The militants hurl threats at the US while having a full time job carving out a base in the world of Islam. They might back up those threats with some sort of murderous attack. Such an attack would be mainly motivated by the desire to strengthen their hand in the Muslim world. The US and its allies have been at war for nearly a decade and a half trying to destroy Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. The victory parade is still a few blocks away. What reason do we have to believe destruction of ISIS will be quicker or easier? I don't doubt that the US military could quickly end ISIS's control of its foothold in Iraq and Syria. It quickly ended Saddam Hussein's control of Iraq. What did that accomplish? It made many Iraqis more militant. The militants blended with the general population popping out to attack when they saw fit. For so long as there is a sizable pool of murderous militants in the Islamic world, they will continue to be a threat to moderate Muslims and the rest of the world. No matter how successful an attack by the US military might be in the short term, it won't eradicate militant Muslims or end their murderous ways. Dispersing the militants and giving them more material for their recruiting posters doesn't seem much like victory. Wanting to eradicate militant Islam and doing it are two very different things. The only solution is for Islam to purge itself of the militants. Outside intervention only encourages other Muslims to rally around or at least tolerate the militants. The US may be able to help by providing support to moderates in the Muslim world. Even in this the US should keep a low profile and be very choosy about who it supports. ISIS is now using weapons and equipment supplied by the US and captured by ISIS. A few decades ago the US armed the Taliban in its fight against the Soviet backed government of Afghanistan. Much to our regret the Taliban prevailed. About a year ago the president of the US and a flock of war hawks wanted to aid Syrian rebels in overthrowing the government of Syria. Those rebels included what is now called ISIS. Many in the US now want to intervene on the side of the Syrian government. What if the US still hasn't got it right? Moderate Islamic powers are coming to fear the militants. Let them spend some of their oil money defending themselves from the militants. We don't have a dog in that fight. If one of their dogs snaps at us, deal with it. Otherwise stay out and don't make matters worse. Militant Islam will never rise close to the level of a world power. Its tactics are to destroy rather than produce. Power is based on production. Without the backing of oil money, militant Muslims would be little more than camel jockeys with spears. aldmccallum@gmail.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Copyright 2014 Albert D. McCallum
Considering the issues of our times. (ADM does not select or endorse the sites reached through "Next Blog.")
Sunday, September 7, 2014
What to Do About ISIS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment